AI Insights

About

Signal over noise.
Every Friday.

AI Insights is a weekly intelligence briefing written for senior technology leaders at global banks and large enterprises — not for developers, not for hobbyists.

Why this exists

The signal problem.

If you run technology at a bank, you have a problem: there is more news about AI than any executive could read in a week, and most of it is wrong, exaggerated, or simply doesn’t matter to your operating environment.

Vendor blogs over-claim. Technical news is written for an audience of practitioners. Mainstream coverage chases the breathless. None of it is calibrated for the question “does this change a decision I’m about to make?”

AI Insights answers that question, once a week, in under ten minutes of reading.

The rubric

Seven dimensions, scored before publication.

Every item that survives ingestion is scored across these seven dimensions by a structured Claude prompt against domain-specific criteria. The result drives both selection and the editorial framing.

01

Evidence strength

How much actual evidence backs the claim — papers, deployments, audited numbers — versus marketing.

02

Novelty

Is this genuinely new, or a repackage of something we covered three weeks ago?

03

Enterprise relevance

Will this affect technology decisions at scale in real organisations within the next 6–18 months?

04

Banking relevance

Specifically: does this matter to G-SIBs and large banks under PRA/FCA/OCC/ECB scrutiny?

05

Implementation maturity

Is this lab work, an experimental release, or a real production-ready system?

06

Hype level

How much of the surrounding noise is signal vs marketing. We expose this score, not hide it.

07

Actionability

Can a leader actually do something with this information, or is it just colour?

Recommended posture

What to actually do about it.

Every kept item carries a recommended posture — a clear stance an executive can hold in a meeting without having to invent one.

WATCH

Track this. No action required, but should be on your scanning list.

EXPLORE

Worth a structured 1–2 week investigation by a small team.

PILOT

Mature enough for a contained, time-boxed proof of concept.

IGNORE

Surface noise. Filed for completeness, not for action.

Editorial principles

What we will and won't do.

  • No vendor pitches. Ever. We do not run sponsored content. If a vendor is mentioned, it is because their work moved a decision.

  • No hype laundering. If something is overhyped, we say so explicitly — and devote an entire section per edition (Contrarian Take) to making the case.

  • Hype score is exposed. Other publications hide editorial judgement. We score every story for hype on a 1-10 scale and show it next to the headline.

  • Banking-first framing. Most AI coverage ignores regulatory weight. We treat it as a primary axis.

  • No engagement bait. No clickbait headlines, no tracking pixels in email, no growth hacks. One short briefing per week is the entire offer.

Join the waitlist.

We’ll email you the moment subscriptions open.

Free during early access. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions? Read the FAQ or email us directly.